Sunrisers Hyderabad qualified for the IPL 2026 Playoffs with a five-wicket win over the Chennai Super Kings at the MA Chidambaram Stadium in Chennai on Monday.
Ishan Kishan anchored the chase with a 47-ball 70 after Pat Cummins picked three wickets to restrict CSK to 180 for seven in 20 overs.
CHENNAI SUPER KINGS
Sanju Samson: 5 – Got the team off to a blistering start before being caught behind off Pat Cummins. (27 runs off 13 balls – 5 fours, 1 six)
Ruturaj Gaikwad:2 – Was a muted presence, struggling to find his usual fluency before falling to Cummins. (15 runs off 21 balls – 0 fours, 0 sixes)
Urvil Patel: 4 – Had a brief but high-impact cameo, smashing two big hits early on before being clean-bowled by Sakib Hussain. (13 runs off 8 balls – 2 sixes)
Karthik Sharma: 5 – Kept the momentum alive through the middle overs with a brisk knock before Nitish Kumar Reddy caught him off Cummins. (32 runs off 19 balls – 3 fours, 2 sixes)
Dewald Brevis: 5.5 – Anchored the back half of the innings and emerged as the top-scorer for CSK with a flurry of sixes before being cleaned up by Eshan Malinga. (44 runs off 27 balls – 2 fours, 4 sixes)
Shivam Dube: 4 – Played a steady supporting role to Brevis, before struggling to push on in the death overs. (26 runs off 23 balls – 3 fours, 1 six)
Prashant Veer: 4 – Struck two boundaries late in the death overs to chip in with quick runs before being caught and bowled by Praful Hinge on the final ball. (11 runs off 9 balls – 2 fours, 0 sixes)
Akeal Hosein: 6 – Picked up the wicket of Abhishek Sharma and restricted the scoring rate. Wasn’t given a final over. (3 off 1 ball and 1/21 in 3 overs)
Noor Ahmed: 4 – The Afghan spinner’s dismissal of Klaasen came a little too late and he was also slightly expensive in his spell. (1/40 in 4 overs)
Anshul Kamboj: 3.5 – The wicket of Ishan Kishan in his final over was merely a consolation. Missed his lengths frequently and proved to be expensive. (1/46 in 4 overs)
Spencer Johnson: 4 – Went wicketless in the game, but displayed good control with the ball during the PowerPlay. (0/26 in 3 overs)
Mukesh Choudhary: 6 – Excellent opening spell in the Powerplay where he curtailed the run flow and picked up the wicket of Travis Head. (2/36 in 4 overs)
SUNRISERS HYDERABAD
Abhishek Sharma: 4.5 – Played a steady knock looking at the conditions but gave his wicket away against a ball fown leg from Hosein. (26 off 21 balls, 3 fours, 1 six)
Travis Head: 3 – Fell early in the chase trying to force the lofted shot against Mukesh. (6 off 6 balls, one four)
Ishan Kishan: 8.5 – Played a match-winning knock to take his side home in a tough chase. Took it deep but fell just before the finish line. (74 off 47 balls, 7 fours, 3 sixes)
Heinrich Klaasen: 7 – Was at his authoritative best as he prevented CSK from exerting any pressure through the middle overs. Fell just short of his fifty. (47 off 26 balls, 6 fours and 2 sixes)
Salil Arora: 6 – Saw the team through despite late wickets falling. (10 off 5 balls, 1 six)
R. Smaran: 5 – Came down late in order to provide the finishing touch to the chase. (5 off 2 balls, 1 four)
Nitish Kumar Reddy: 3 – Opened the bowling but found it tough to contain Sanju Samson, leaking a few big hits in his short spell. Also contributed a 7-ball 11 in the business end of the chase. (2-0-35-0)
Praful Hinge: 3.5 – Bowled a high-pressure final over and was rewarded with a wicket off the very last delivery of the innings. (3-0-37-1)
Pat Cummins: 8 – The pick of SRH bowlers, he delivered a masterclass in hard-length bowling to break crucial partnerships. (4-0-28-3)
Eshan Malinga: 6.5 – Produced a disciplined spell at the death, castling the dangerous Brevis. (4-0-26-1)
Sakib Hussain: 7 – Stayed aggressive through the middle and death overs, rattling the stumps twice to claim key wickets. (4-0-34-2)
Shivang Kumar: 6 – Contained CSK in the middle phase of the innings, but ended wicketless. (3-0-20-0)
The rating points are an output of a relative grading based on CricViz Match Impact scores from the CSK vs SRH match.
CricViz Match Impact quantifies the additional or reduced runs contributed by a player in comparison to an average player operating within the identical game context. Each delivery is assessed and assigned a positive or negative run value, reflecting how it influences the team’s expected total.
Published on May 19, 2026
