Pope Leo XIV released the pontiff’s first encyclical on Monday, a document that outlined the critical importance of human dignity and morality in the era of artificial intelligence (AI).
But the release of the encyclical revealed an unusual collaboration between the Vatican and Anthropic, a Silicon Valley AI start-up whose co-founder Christopher Olah joined Pope Leo and leading
theologians on a Vatican panel.
Anthropic, which employs an in-house philosopher to help introduce morality in its AI, has dabbled with the philosophy on whether its models experience consciousness.
The Pope invited Olah to speak at the presentation of the encyclical in the Vatican City in an
effort to broaden the conversation on the important questions raised by AI. Perhaps the Pope found AI a worthy topic
based on his training as a mathematician.
advertisement
advertisement
The Pope, born Robert Francis Prevost, earned a Bachelor of Science (BS) degree in mathematics from Villanova University in 1977 and taught physics
and math at St. Rita of Cascia High School.
Reports suggest Olah was chosen because of his focus on AI safety, engagement with religious communities. Anthropic also has a reputation for
developing AI models based on ethics that align with the Pope’s initiative to safeguard human dignity.
“I want to begin with something that may sound strange coming from the co-founder
of an AI company — and someone who chose this work out of a desire to help things go well for humankind,” Olah wrote in his speech, published on Anthropic’s website. “That is why, if we want this technology to go well, it is enormously
important that there be people outside those incentives — people who care about things going well and insist on safety, who are paying close attention, who are willing to say hard things, who
are willing to be our earnest, thoughtful, critics. It is through dialogue and mutual effort, through the push and pull, that humanity will achieve great things.”
Olah expressed his
gratitude to His Holiness and the church to take up this work. In the past, he wrote about the importance of Claude, Anthropic’s AI
model, becoming more ethical.
“To disarm means discrediting the assumption that technical power automatically confers the right to govern,” the pope said Monday in his new
encyclical to the faithful. “To disarm does not mean rejecting technology, but preventing it from dominating humanity.”
about what it means to be human. It draws on 2,000 years of moral and social teachings. The timing of the document was “symbolic,” according to The National Catholic Reporter.
“It was signed on the 135th anniversary of Pope
Leo XIII’s 1891 Rerum Novarum, which protected workers’ rights during the Industrial Revolution,” according to the media outlet.
From
the Pope, the document — Magnifica humanitas, released Monday — means “magnificent humanity” in Latin. It marks the Pontiff’s most consequential act since becoming the head of the
world’s 1.4 billion Catholics one year ago.
Encyclicals present a way for a pope to provide moral guidance on the greatest challenges of their times. This Pope has chosen artificial
intelligence and how it will impact humanity. But the most intriguing part is his decision to present it with Olah present.
Olah welcomed the Pope’s words. He wrote in his presentation
that “we dwell so often on what divides us, but humanity, full of dignity and conscience, has so much common ground.”
In conversations at Anthropic, executives have found shared and deeply
held convictions about AI.
“Some might believe that matters of AI are best handled by computer scientists like myself,” Olah wrote. “They are mistaken: the questions raised by AI are bigger
than the AI research community, not just in their implications, but also in their nature.”
AI systems are not engineered the way a bridge or an airplane is engineered. People understand an
airplane because we designed every part of it and we understand the physics that act on it. AI models are grown and structured after the brain, he wrote, adding that AI is made from humans, from human
words, and they remain important in ways that are mysterious to even those who train them, according to Olah’s vision.
The machinery that makes this possible is the work of math and
programming and science, but the characters chosen, how it interacts with the world, how it should interact with the world—are things more clearly questioned for humanitiee, religion,
philosophy, and society, Olah wrote.
In the speech, Olah asks “religious communities, civil society, scholars, governments, and all people of good will — to do what His Holiness has done
here: to take this seriously, to look closely, and to push events in a better direction.” He adds: “We need informed critics who will tell the labs when we are failing. We need moral voices that the
incentives cannot bend.”
